| |
Liz Shriberg, a senior researcher at ICSI, was quoted
on January 3, 2004 in a New York Times article about disfluencies in
speech. She was subsequently interviewed live on the radio talk show
"Adler On Line" with Charles Adler of CJOB 68 Radio in Winnipeg, Canada,
on Friday, January 9.
A major focus of Shriberg's speech research is disfluency
detection in automatic speech recognition, because, as she says in the
NY Times article, "If someday you want machines to be as smart as
people, then you have to have machines that understand speech that's
natural, and natural speech has lots of disfluencies in it."
In her radio interview, Shriberg discussed the use of
disfluencies in television and film - from the over-emphasized slang use
of the word "so" in the popular TV series "Friends" to Mamet's films in
which "lines are delivered not only without disfluencies, but with a
very unnatural robotic-sounding prosody." Prosody is another focus of
Shriberg's speech research; much like disfluencies, natural speech
contains a lot of prosodic variation. According to Shriberg, the main
point she tried to convey during the radio interview was that
"disfluencies are part of language: they allow us to cope with the many
complex cognitive and discourse-level demands that people need to juggle
when speaking."
The New York
Times Article >>
top |
|