ISSUES FOR COMMENT AND DISCUSSION BY THE PANEL A. Research Collaborations 1. From the perspective of your company/agency, what are the most important components of an academic site's activities? Do they concern the specific research conducted at the site? The manner in which students are trained? The potential for exchanges of individuals between sites? The regular interaction and exchange of information? What other components are important? 2. In what ways can academic research sites most fruitfully collaborate with your company/agency, as well as with industry and government in general? 3. In what ways would it be possible for industrial sites to keep academic research relevant to speech technology (without sacrificing the more speculative, open-ended nature of academic work)? 4. Do you believe there are advantages in academic sites forming collaborative networks that go beyond the traditional collaborations formed for individual research projects? And if so, what would these be? Do you believe that geographical proximity is an important factor in collaboration or not? Are there any disadvantages of forming collaborative networks among academic sites? And if so, what would these be? 5. What are the most important qualities you look for in hiring individuals from academic sites for your research group? 6. What concerns do you have concerning intellectual property that might arise from academic-industry research collaborations? Are there currently mechanisms in place at your company/agency to handle such concerns? If so, what would these be? B. The Future of Speech Technology 1. Are there research topics that you believe academic research sites should focus on over the next five years that industry itself is unlikely to address during this interval? If so, what would these be and how would you view the relationship between academic and corporate sites pertaining to these research topics? 2. In view of the current demand for speech-tech-trained individuals in industry (at the Ph.D, MS and BS levels) how should academic institutions balance the amount of training focused on basic research relative to the more practical side of speech-tech for students ultimately destined for industry? From your own perspective, what is currently missing from academic programs? 3. What do you foresee as the most significant challenges in the development of truly robust speech recognition systems that work under a wide variety of acoustic and speaking conditions? 4. Is speech recognition and synthesis technology ever likely to be as reliable as what humans are capable of doing? Are humans ever likely to feel completely comfortable verbally interacting with machines? If not, what impact are these issues likely to have on the research performed at academic sites? 5. Do you view a speech-controlled internet as being a key technology, or will individuals keep using a mouse/keyboard and (perhaps shortly) a palm-top PDA (with pen) to interact with the web and internet? 6. What do you believe is (are) likely to be the key financially successful application(s) of speech recognition technology in the near future, as well as in the long term - dictation, telecommunications, hands- free interaction (as would occur in a car) or something else? What are the long term financial prospects for speech technology in general? Is it likely to make large amounts of money for companies in and of itself? Or will it be more like a commodity that is integrated into larger applications and services?